Legal Opinion

Todd v. Allen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from Atehison District Court. Todd sued Allen, to recover certain moneys alleged to have been collected and received by Allen for the use of Todd. The district court gave judgment in favor of Allen, at the November Term 1875, and Todd brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court, was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The plaintiff Todd and the defendant Allen were formerly partners in the drug business, under the name of Allen & Todd. On 17th June 1874 they entered into a written executory coutract to dissolve their copartnership, and to sell their partnership business, including all their partnership property and good-.will, to the partner who would pay the most therefor. Afterward they made *544an estimate of their assets and liabilities, Band on June 18th or 19th sold said business and all their assets, except certain accounts denominated “worthless…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coonrod & Walz Construction Co. v. Motel Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  2. Bailey v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  3. Hill v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Saddlewood Downs, L.L.C. v. Holland Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  5. Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API