Hill v. Maxwell
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Sedgwick district court; David M. Dale, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Burch, J.:
This action was brought to recover a
balance claimed to be due for the sale of a tract of land. After the evidence was all in the court declined to submit the case to the jury called to try it, and directed a verdict for the plaintiff. The evidence favorable to the defendant tended to show the following state of facts: The defendant agreed to purchase of the plaintiff a tract of land represented to contain 320 acres, at the price of fifteen dollars per acre. He made a small partial payment, and went into possession. -Before the day appointed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neely v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Butler v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Todd v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coonrod & Walz Construction Co. v. Motel Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Bailey v. NortonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
- Gibbs v. ErbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Haas v. NemethSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Saddlewood Downs, L.L.C. v. Holland Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.