Legal Opinion

Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Wardman Real Estate Properties, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 26, 1940No. 53117PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUHRING, Justice.

The interveners, W. Bissell Thomas and William B. O’Connell, have filed two motions herein which were heard together on the 10th day of February, 1940.

The first motion, filed July 8th, 1939, suggests that the court sua sponte vacate orders and decrees heretofore entered, and make “such further orders and decrees as to equity may seem meet on the facts, all apparent on the face of the record, to which attention of the court is respectfully directed.” This motion was filed during vacation and was not brought to the attention of the court until several months later.

The second…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  3. In Re PottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Buffington v. HarveySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. National Brake & Electric Co. v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Geo. P. Reintjes Co. v. Riley Stoker Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  2. Fraser v. DoingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  3. McGinn v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  4. Albion-Idaho Land Co. v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1945
  5. United States v. Certain Lands in Town of HighlandsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API