Canton-Hughes Pump Co. v. Llera
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern Division of the Northern District of Ohio; William R. Day, Judge. Action by Manuel Llera against the Canton-Hughes Pump Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The facts are fully enough stated in our opinion upon our review of the first trial. 205 Fed. 209, 123 C. C. A. 397. Upon the new trial, the question of the amount due was sub*80mitted to the jury, credit was permitted on account of the money received by Llera upon his substituted sale referred to in the former opinion, and- he had verdict and judgment for $2,520. The Pump Company again asks review, and assigns errors concerning the admission and weight of evidence.
[1, 2] Upon the theory that the amount of Llera’s agreed compensation was in dispute, the Pump Company sought…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Canton-Hughes Pump Co. v. LleraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Standard Plunger Elevator Co. v. BrumleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1906
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wright v. WallingDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
- Geracy, Inc. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Geracy, Inc. v. HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942