Legal Opinion

Smith v. McCluskey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. Docket No. 56, Calendar No. 35,272PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This case was tried before the court without a jury. He filed findings of fact which may be summarized as follows: In the last will and testament of Arthur H. Hartshorn, he provided for the payment by his executors to the defendant Mc-Cluskey, as trustee, of certain moneys for the use and benefit of his son, Arthur A. Hartshorn. It seems undisputed that the sums so received by him and interest thereon, less advances made to Arthur, pursuant to the terms of the trust, amounted at the time of the trial to the sum of $6,440.37. McCluskey qualified as such trustee by giving a bond with Harry H.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bergen v. . Urbahn, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Walker v. BuhlMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Petherick v. General Assembly of OrderMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rousseau v. Brotherhood of American YeomenMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Martin v. McReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. HartshornMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API