Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Ross v. Lawes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order dismissing writ of habeas corpus affirmed. The relator’s contention, that he cannot be returned to prison for a violation of his parole unless he has been guilty of the *639commission of a felony while on parole, is met by the amendment of 1921 (Laws of 1921, chap. 567) of section 243 of the Prison Law, which subjects a prisoner whose sentence is reduced by the Governor to the control of the Board of Parole, and even though the relator’s sentence commenced prior to said amendment, the amendment was applicable to the relator. (People ex rel. Mongno v. Lawes, 225 App. Div. 193; People ex rel.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People ex rel. Mongno v. LawesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Kurzynski v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Vanilla v. MoranNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State Ex Rel. Bush v. WhittierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. People ex rel. Kleinger v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  5. United States ex rel. Humphries v. HuntDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API