Legal Opinion

Abraham v. Exxon Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1996No. 95-30704PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs N. Mark Abraham and others (collectively “Abraham”) appeal a summary judgment in favor of Exxon Corporation and the Benefit Plan of Exxon Corporation (collectively “Exxon”) on their ERISA 1 claims. We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part.

I

The plaintiffs are “leased” or “special agreement” employees of Exxon who work at Exxon facilities. They are similar to ordinary Exxon employees in many ways: They report to Exxon supervisors, have Exxon business cards, and play on the Exxon softball team. Exxon is not their direct employer, however. Instead,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kenneth E. Wildbur, Sr. v. Arco Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. T.J. Kennedy v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tait v. Barbknecht & Tait Profit Sharing PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1998
  2. Abraham v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. Kiper v. Novartis Crop Protection, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API