Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Secretary of Health, Education, & Welfare

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 13, 1971No. 71-C-222 CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

Defendant moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s action for the reason the same was not filed within sixty days of the final decision of the Defendant, as required by 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) and (h). Plaintiff refers to Rule 6(e), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S. C.A. and asserts that as the notice of the Appeals Council denying his claim was served by mail, three days must be added to the pei’iod of sixty days and that therefore the action was timely filed.

*271Plaintiff’s assertion is not correct. Rule 82, F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. admits of no interpretation of the rules which will extend…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ewing v. RisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  2. Zeller v. FolsomDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
  3. Stillman Small v. John W. Gardner, Secretary, Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wiss v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Easter Seal Society for Disabled Children v. BerryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. O'NEILL v. HecklerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. United Farm Workers v. Arizona Agricultural Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  5. Blackamore v. Commisioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API