Legal Opinion

Shellman v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1924No. 4140PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foreging facts.)

The defendant excepts to an instruction by the court to the jury, that the State contends that the prisoner made certain incriminatory statements. The defendant asserts that these state■ments were not incrimitory, and that, for this reason,” the charge of the court that the defendant had made incriminatory statements was prejudicial to his case.” The court did not tell the jury that the defendant had made incriminatory statements, but *792only instructed the jury that the State contended that he had made certain specific incriminatory statements. It is one thing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Riley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Fletcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  4. Covington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  5. Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Rawlings v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. State v. ReidNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Nair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API