Legal Opinion

PRUDENTIAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION v. Porcaro

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 9, 1975No. 74-82-AppealPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelleher, J.

The defendant Felix Porcaro is before us on his appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court affirming the District Court’s denial of his motion to vacate a default judgment that was entered against him. Hereinafter, we shall refer to the plaintiff as “Prudential” and the defendant by his last name.

On August 28, 1964, Porcaro and his mother signed a promissory note wherein they agreed to pay Prudential the sum of $2,466.40 in weekly installments for 124 months. The note contained an acceleration clause whereby in case of a default, the remaining balance would become düe and payable.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Gulf Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  2. Caprio v. Fanning & Doorley Construction Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. Nocera v. LemboSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  4. Sousa v. CaseySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  5. Bloom v. TrudeauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Quin Blair Enterprises, Inc. v. Julien Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vitale v. ElliottSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  3. Curtis v. Diversified Chemicals & Propellants Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. Friendly Home, Inc. v. Shareholders & Creditors of Royal Homestead Land Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Catone v. Multimedia Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API