Legal Opinion
William Neal Moore v. Ralph Kemp
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided July 27, 1987No. 84-8423PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
Petitioner Moore raised in a second federal habeas petition new grounds not raised in his first federal petition and allegedly based upon new principles of law laid down since the first federal petition. The major decision for the en banc court concerns the determination of whether this was an abuse of the writ under Rule 9(b) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Moore was convicted of murder in Georgia after a plea of guilty and sentenced to death. He has filed a first state petition for habeas, followed by a first federal petition, a second state petition, and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Coleman v. SaffleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Calvin Gunn v. Lanson Newsome, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- William Neal Moore v. Walter ZantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Laville Hannon v. Herb Maschner and Attorney General of the State of Kansas, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.