Legal Opinion
Mills v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 21, 1965No. 6 Div. 169PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
This is a “petition for writ of error to the Circuit Court of Tuscaloosa County, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, to review judgment of conviction of carnal knowledge, criminal case No. 6333-A” on the part of William R. Mills, a state convict. The State filed a motion to strike the petition and it is well taken.
The appropriate remedy to raise the errors here complained of is by petition for writ of error coram nobis filed in the trial court and reviewed on appeal in this Court. Hence, the petition for writ of error does not lie. — Tit. IS, §§ 380(14)-380(25), Code of Ala., as recompiled…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aaron v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Latham v. CrouseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Freddy Green v. Lynn Bomar, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Davis v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Queor v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
- Curry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973