Legal Opinion

Petroman v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

This action was brought under the provisions of the General Statutes, § 6140, the essential portions of which are as follows: “Every person who shall cut, destroy or carry away any trees, timber or underwood, standing or lying on the land of another, or on town commons, or on any common or undivided land, without license of the owner, and all who shall aid therein, shall pay to the party injured one dollar for every tree or pole under one foot in diameter; and for all trees of a diameter of one foot or more three times their value; but when the court shall be satisfied that the defendant was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Daley v. Norwich & Worcester RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1858
  2. Richard v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Merwin v. MorrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  4. Laukaitis v. KliknaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  5. Turgeon v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Gosselin v. PerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  4. Clark v. DrskaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
  5. Jackson v. WallerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API