Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Y & M Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 30, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 87-0334PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

The sole issue raised in this appeal is propriety of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to defendant/appellee.

*337Appellants entered into a contract with appellee for the construction of a private residence. When the contract was executed, appellants signed promissory notes secured by deeds of trust in favor of appel-lee for the sum of $13,000 as partial payment for the cost of construction. After the house was completed, appellants complained of faulty construction in various areas. Appellee attempted to make repairs; however, appellants were not satisfied. They…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Mark Lighting Fixture Co. v. General Electric Supply Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. United States (Treasury Dept., IRS) v. Globe Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Callanan v. Sun Lakes Homeowners' Ass'n 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Monti v. MontiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  2. Trantor v. FredriksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. Samuel Paz v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023
  4. Seronde v. bnsf/morrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Trantor v. FredriksonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API