Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trantor v. Fredrikson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 18, 1993No. 1 CA-CV 91-0179Published

1DissentMcGREGOR, Judge

The majority’s decision to vacate the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees results from two conclusions. First, the majority concludes that “a trial court must make appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law in awarding attorney’s fees under either A.R.S. §§ 12-341.01(0) or 12-349.” Op. at 391, 861 P.2d at 676. I agree. State v. Richey, 160 Ariz. 564, 565, 774 P.2d 1354, 1355 (1989). Second, the majority concludes that if a trial court fails to set forth specific findings supporting an award of fees, this court must vacate the award even though the party opposing the award did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Educational Testing Services v. KatzmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. State v. RicheyArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Bayless Investment & Trading Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. Callanan v. Sun Lakes Homeowners' Ass'n 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Hamm v. Y & M Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API