Garland v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This appeal concerns the scope of the government’s jurisdiction under the federal Clean Water Act (the Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) to regulate water pollutants. Enacted in 1972, the Act prohibits any person from discharging a pollutant into “navigable waters”—i.e., into “the waters of the United States”—from a “point source” (a discrete conveyance of pollutants) without a permit. (See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq., 1311(a), 1342(a), 1362(7), (12), (14).)1
In Rapanos v. United States (2006) 547 U.S. 715 [165 L.Ed.2d 159, 126 S.Ct. 2208] (Rapanos), its most recent decision on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Malaga County Water Dist. v. Central Valley Regional Water etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020