Legal Opinion

Garland v. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 24, 2012No. C067130PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

This appeal concerns the scope of the government’s jurisdiction under the federal Clean Water Act (the Act; 33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.) to regulate water pollutants. Enacted in 1972, the Act prohibits any person from discharging a pollutant into “navigable waters”—i.e., into “the waters of the United States”—from a “point source” (a discrete conveyance of pollutants) without a permit. (See 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251 et seq., 1311(a), 1342(a), 1362(7), (12), (14).)1

In Rapanos v. United States (2006) 547 U.S. 715 [165 L.Ed.2d 159, 126 S.Ct. 2208] (Rapanos), its most recent decision on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Griset v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malaga County Water Dist. v. Central Valley Regional Water etc.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API