Legal Opinion

Oakford & Fahnestock v. Dunlap

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 6, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trial of the Right of Property.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of McLean County; the Hon. Thomas F. Tipton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1895.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Pleasants

deliveeed the opinion of the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict for the claimant on a trial of the right of property. The facts, in outline, are as follows:

George W. Royster was conducting a general mercantile business in the village of Anchor, in the course of which he became indebted to appellants and other parties. Among them was his step-father-in-law, the appellee, who was farming in Indiana. In June, 1894, an agent of the Smith-Wallace Shoe Co., a creditor to the amount of $620, came to Anchor to get a settlement, which Royster did not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanchett v. GoetzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. GuckenheimerSupreme Court of Florida · 1897
  2. Ball v. Callahan & SonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  3. Hulman & Co. v. J. B. McBryde & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API