State v. Dove
North Dakota Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceTeigen, Chief Justice
I concur in the result. However, I do not agree with the broad language of paragraph number 3 of the syllabus. Our holding, as set forth in the opinion, is limited to the principle of law that where a search warrant was based upon an affidavit which does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, any evidence obtained as a result of the search is inadmissible. The opinion applies the federal constitutional requirements as interpreted by the federal decisions. I agree that the affidavit in this case does not meet the federal standards and, therefore, under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. FahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. PauleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. LacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927