Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Dove

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1970No. Cr. 400Published

1ConcurrenceTeigen, Chief Justice

I concur in the result. However, I do not agree with the broad language of paragraph number 3 of the syllabus. Our holding, as set forth in the opinion, is limited to the principle of law that where a search warrant was based upon an affidavit which does not meet the requirements of the Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, any evidence obtained as a result of the search is inadmissible. The opinion applies the federal constitutional requirements as interpreted by the federal decisions. I agree that the affidavit in this case does not meet the federal standards and, therefore, under…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. State v. FahnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  3. State v. PauleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. LacyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API