Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. King County v. Murrow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1939No. 27510. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJeffers, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff and relator, King county, from a judgment of dismissal in favor of defendant and respondent, Lacey V. Murrow, as director of highways of the state of Washington, in a mandamus action, wherein plaintiff sought to obtain a writ to compel defendant to approve and allow a voucher for $6,335.45, as a proper claim against the motor vehicle fund allocated to plaintiff, for the purpose of reimbursing plaintiff’s county road fund for premiums paid from the last named fund for marine insurance, containing fire coverage, insuring the ferry boats Mercer, Washington, Leschi,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dallas County v. PlowmanTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. State Ex. Rel. Wash. Nav. Co. v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. French v. Mayor of MillvilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Reynolds v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rich v. WilliamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  2. AUTOMOBILE CLUB ETC. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Prince George's County v. AluisiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Smull v. DelaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Raynor v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API