Legal Opinion
United States v. McPhilomy
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 9, 2001No. 00-4141, 00-4144PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TACHA, Chief Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
A jury found Michael McPhilomy, Sr., (“Senior”) and Michael McPhilomy, Jr., (“Junior”) guilty of two felony counts of aiding and abetting each other in the theft of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 641. The jury also found Junior guilty of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Cerrato-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. IrvingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. FredetteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Yarchak v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- United States v. Timothy J. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PlatteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.