Legal Opinion
Latson v. Sessions
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 23, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2016-1488PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
The pro se plaintiff, Elvenia A. Latson, brings this civil action against the defendant, Jefferson B. Sessions, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”), alleging that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (the “Bureau”) unlawfully discriminated against her based on her race, gender, and age, and retaliated against her due to her pursuit of earlier statutorily protected activity, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kerr v. U.S. Dep't of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kerr v. Department of StateDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018