Legal Opinion

Incarnacion v. Thomas

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 19, 2011No. 3D10-2208Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAGOA, Judge.

Appellant, Maria Incarnacion (“Incarna-cion”), the defendant below, appeals an order dismissing the proceedings for In-carnacion’s counsel’s failm-e to appear at a case management conference. Because we find that the trial court abused its discretion in dismissing the proceedings, we reverse.

While a trial court’s decision to impose sanctions is discretionary, that discretion is not absolute. The imposition of sanctions requires wrongdoing by the party being sanctioned, and the sanction must be commensurate with the offense. See Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla.1983); Cossio v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mercer v. RaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  2. Kamhi v. Waterview Towers Condo. Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Taylor v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Cossio v. ArrondoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API