Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided November 9, 2005No. 3D04-2259PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
The Plaintiff, Ruth Taylor, appeals the denial of a motion for continuance, an order striking the testimony of the plaintiffs witnesses and the granting of a directed verdict in favor of the appellee, Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (“Mazda Motor”). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Ms. Taylor brought suit in the Eleventh Judicial Circuit in and for Miami-Dade County, Florida, against Mazda Motor for damages for breach of warranty after purchasing a new vehicle. At the time of the filing of the lawsuit, May 23, 2003, her attorney, Mr. Weisberg, was located in Chicago, Illinois, and planning…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mercer v. RaineSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Pascual v. DozierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- First Republic Corp. of America v. HayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Edwards v. PrattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. BuchwaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Krock v. RozinskyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Cossio v. ArrondoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Ramos v. Ventures TrustDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- A.G. v. Department of Children & Family ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Aquasol Condo Assoc. v. HSBC Bank USADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.