Legal Opinion

Highstone v. Burdette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Mackinac. (Steeres, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Under an Act of Congress entitled “An act to confirm certain claims to lands in the territory of Michigan,”1 the heirs of Prancis [Clairmon] Claremont were confirmed in their claim “to the tract of land containing seventy-eight acres and ninety one-hundredths of án acre,, bounded northwardly by lot numbered eleven, eastwardly by Lake Huron, southwardly by lot numbered nine, and westwardly by the public lands; and being designated on the connected map of private claims at Michilimackinac as ‘lot numbered ten, at Point St. Ignace.’ ” A patent was issued by the United States to the heirs of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Newell v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
  2. Carpentier v. MendenhallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Van Bibber v. FerdinandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  4. Clark v. CregoNew York Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Blackmore v. GreggSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fuller v. SwensbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Kelley v. RichardsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Beall v. McMenemyNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Price v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Houghton County v. MassieMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API