Legal Opinion
E.M. Ex Rel. E.M. v. Pajaro Valley Unified School District Office of Administrative Hearings
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 15, 2014No. 12-15743PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:
In 2004, before E.M. entered the fourth grade, he was first tested for a learning disability. Through this lengthy litigation it has been established that E.M. has an auditory processing disorder or a central auditory processing disorder. However, in the fall of 2004 and the spring of 2005, E.M.’s school district, the Pajaro Valley Unified School District (“PVUSD”) tested E.M. and determined that, despite his learning disability, E.M. was not eligible for special education services. Subsequently, as a result of further testing procured by E.M.’s parents, PVUSD…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mr and Mrs Doe v. Cape Elizabeth SchoolCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- Miguel Avila v. Spokane School District 81Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Thomas Creech v. Josh TewaltCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Meridian Joint School District No. 2 v. D.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- I.R. ex rel. E.N. v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.