Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pumplin v. Hohle

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

Petition for writ of mandamus to compel defendant, as county clerk of Pierce county, to issue a permit to plaintiff to hold a public dance on May 22, 1930. Briefly stated, the facts alleged in the petition and answer, and admitted on the trial and found by the court, are as follows : Plaintiff owns and operates a dance pavilion in Pierce county in which he conducts public dances for profit, which constitutes his sole revenue from the property. He constructed the dance pavilion in the year 1929 at an expense of $8,000, and he made a profit of about $1,600. If he is not permitted to hold more…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Federal Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Devereaux v. Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State ex rel. McManman v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stetzer v. Chippewa CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API