Legal Opinion
United States v. George Condon, Samuel William Brawner
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 18, 1998No. 96-8780PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendants-appellants George Condon and Samuel William Brawner appeal from jury convictions for making false statements to the Small Business Administration (“SBA”), in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 645(a), and conspiracy to do the same. Because none of Defendants’ issues merits reversal, we affirm.
Background
In 1989 Defendants became involved in a real estate deal. Defendant Condon (“Con-don”) agreed to sell land and a building to Defendant Brawner (“Brawner”), on which Brawner intended to operate a restaurant. The two were assisted in the transaction by Condon’s attorney, Marc Aeree (“Aeree”).
To…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric Cross, and Robert Carter LodgeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,114 United States of America v. Herbert LindoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Donald Edward MilesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raul Trujillo, Francisco Nelson FuentesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Robert PetrieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. FulfordCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.