Legal Opinion

Brown v. Tamarack & Custer Consolidated Mining Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.

— This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Kootenai county refusing to change the place of trial.

The action was brought by respondents to recover for damage by appellant to certain lands and personal property situated in Kootenai county. Appellant demurred and answered, and at the same time filed a demand in writing that the trial be had in Shoshone county for the reason that Kootenai was not the proper county. (C. S., sec. 6665.) Appellant also filed a formal motion, supported by affidavits, for change of venue under C. S., sec. 6666, setting up twelve grounds, including all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Callahan v. CallahanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Newman v. District Court of the Tenth Judicial District ex rel. County of Nez PerceIdaho Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Banbury v. BrailsfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API