Legal Opinion
YANEZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2002No. ID 3473PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
23 I&N Dec. 390
(BIA 2002) Interim Decision #3473 In re Ismael YANEZ-Garcia, Respondent File A91 334 042 - Chicago Decided May 13, 2002 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The determination whether a state drug offense constitutes a “drug trafficking crime” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2) (2000), such that it may be considered an “aggravated felony” under section 101(a)(43)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(B) (2000), shall be made by reference to decisional authority from the federal circuit courts…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Lopez v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jose Encarnacion Cedano-Viera v. John D. Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Jesus Aaron Cazarez-Gutierrez v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Conteh v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- ASSAADBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.