Oberfest v. 300 West End Ave. Associates Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a motion by the defendant to dismiss the complaint, under subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the *964Buies of Civil Practice, on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient, to constitute a cause of action. The substance of the complaint follows:
The defendant is the owner of a building which was converted into a co-operative apartment house pursuant to an offering statement and plan of co-operative ownership (hereinafter sometimes called prospectus). The plaintiff is a tenant stockholder of the defendant and a lessee of an apartment under a proprietary lease with the defendant. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Varney v. . DitmarsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greenblatt v. ZimmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- State Storm Window Co. v. HerderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ruggiero v. Long Island RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Blenheim LLC v. Il Posto LLCCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006
- Prospect Owners Corp. v. SandmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Telesca v. M. L. Bruenn Co.New Rochelle City Court · 1972
- Baum v. TowersNew York Supreme Court · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.