Telesca v. M. L. Bruenn Co.
New Rochelle City Court
1Opinion of the Court
Richard L. Baltimore, Jr., J.
These two summary proceedings under the same title, one for possession of the demised, premises on the ground, of nonpayment.of rent and the second on the ground that the respondent is a squatter, are being tried by consent on a stipulation of facts.
The agreed facts are:
1. Respondent and its predecessors in interest have been in possession of the premises, the subject matter of the proceedings through mesne leases from approximately April 1,1959.
2. The present lease of the premises dated August 30, 1968, was entered into on or about that date between petitioner’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Dollard v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Doyle v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Presby v. . BenjaminNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Graves v. . BerdanNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance v. Executive Plaza, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Blenheim LLC v. Il Posto LLCCivil Court of the City of New York · 2006