Jain v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶[1 — Naveen and Anuradha Jain were found by a federal district court to have violated section 16(b) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934.1 The case was settled pending appeal. The Jains then brought state tort claims against a brokerage and two law firms involved in the securities case. The superior court dismissed those claims, finding that they constituted de facto indemnity claims barred under federal securities law. We affirm.
Baker, J.
I
¶2 Naveen Jain founded InfoSpace, Inc., in 1996 and served as an officer and director of the company until 2002. In 1998, InfoSpace went public and sold…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Roth v. JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Reliance Electric Co. v. Emerson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foremost-McKeeson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.