Legal Opinion
Lasorte v. Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Severally Subscribing to Policy Numbers 115nap108111970 & 115nap109111970
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 5, 2014No. CV 12-87-M-DWMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DONALD W. MOLLOY, District Judge.
Introduction
This is a breach of contract case. Plaintiff Samantha Lasorte seeks judgment against Defendant, Those Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s (“Defendants” or “the Insurer”), for breach of an insurance policy issued by the Insurer to Plaintiffs employer, Real Estate Client Referrals (“the Employer” or “the Insured”), against whom Lasorte acquired judgment in an underlying state court discrimination suit. Defendants have moved for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below the motion is denied in part and granted in part. Based on the existing…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- White v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Parks Real Estate Purchasing Group v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hammond v. Newrez LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- In Re Aearo Technologies LLC Insurance AppealsSupreme Court of Delaware · 2025