Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, Inc

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2016No. Docket 150616Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMcCormack, J.

I agree with the majority that the plaintiff presented sufficient evidence of discrimination such that the trial court did not err by denying the defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. But I respectfully dissent from the majority’s decision to vacate the jury award for future damages. I do not agree that the defendant’s disclosures of the plaintiffs unprofessional conduct subjected the defendant to any “civil liability for the disclosure,” which I agree MCL 380.1230b(3) would bar. No, the defendant incurred all its civil liability in this case when it discharged the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. Dow Chemical CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. in Re Bradley EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Heather Lynn Hannay v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Morris v. Clawson Tank Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Beals v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API