Legal Opinion

State v. Lynch

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 16, 2006No. ED 87896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGlenn A. Norton, C.J.

Defendant Charles Lynch appeals from a judgment denying his motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute, speedy trial and Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act. The appeal is dismissed.

This Court has a duty to examine its jurisdiction sua sponte. State v. Palm, 158 S.W.3d 861 (Mo.App. E.D.2005). In criminal cases, the right of appeal is limited to final judgments. Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. A judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo.App. E.D.1993).

Here, no judgment and sentence has been entered. Defendant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WelchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. PalmMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. LigginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. PurkettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Hamm v. CrawfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Peet v. CarterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Redden v. ReddenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Walker v. SmallwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API