Legal Opinion

Hamm v. Crawford

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 28, 2009No. ED 92440PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNannette A. Baker, C.J.

Plaintiff Paul Hamm (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for declaratory judgment he filed against Larry Crawford, Michael Layden, and Steve Larkin (Respondents). Because Appellant’s notice of appeal is untimely, the appeal is dismissed.

This Court has an obligation to discern its jurisdiction to consider an appeal. State v. Lynch, 192 S.W.3d 502 (Mo.App. E.D.2006). If a timely notice of appeal has not been filed, this Court is without jurisdiction to review the appeal and it must be dismissed. Roberts Plaza II, LLC v. 1915 LLC, 209 S.W.3d 535, 536…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buff v. RoperMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. LynchMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Roberts Plaza II, LLC v. 4915 LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Collector of Revenue of the City of St. Louis v. Parcels of Land Encumbered With Delinquent Tax LiensMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Dudley v. SOUTHERN UNION COMPANYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API