Legal Opinion
State v. Doolittle
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 8, 1983No. 9716PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
After a trial to the jury the defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). Just prior to the trial, the court, Reynolds, J., held an evidentiary hearing on the defendant’s “Motion to Suppress Eye Witness Identification and/or Photographic Identification” and denied that motion. At the end of the state’s ease in chief, the court granted the defendant’s oral motion to reopen the hearing on this motion to suppress to add testimony that had come out during the trial. The court denied the motion to suppress after considering the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- State v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. SantangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. MilnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.