Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 28, 1995No. A95A1349PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Rickie Lee Pruitt was indicted for the offense of burglary. He was tried before a jury and found guilty. His motion for new trial was denied, and he appeals.

1. Pruitt contends the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, specifically arguing that no evidence was presented that he entered the victim’s home, a necessary element of the offense under OCGA § 16-7-1.

The victim testified she returned to her home about 1:00 p.m. and observed a “scruffy looking” man carrying a backpack walking from her house to the house next door. When she entered her housé she saw…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Faust v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Stevens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Baynes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Bethel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. Hemphill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API