Legal Opinion

Melone v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1935No. Civ. 10185PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHINN, J., pro tem.

Upon findings that respondent Roy Cuccia, 16 years of age, suffered injuries in the course of and arising out of his employment by the petitioner herein, an award was made to him by the Industrial Accident Commission, based upon the minimum average earnings provided by law as a basis for compensation, and also for certain expenses and attorney’s fees. The only point urged on this proceeding to review the award of respondent Commission is that the applicant Cuccia was not an employee of petitioner under the Workmen’s Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917, as amended.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Flickenger v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Claremont Country Club v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Harlan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California Employment Commission v. Los Angeles Down Town Shopping News Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. West v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API