Legal Opinion
Rubber Shop Inc. v. Benicorp Insurance
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided November 15, 2006No. 3:05 CV 279 RLMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
NUECHTERLEIN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On August 18, 2006, Plaintiffs The Rubber Shop Inc. d/b/a Royal Rubber Company, Victor Grabovez, and Claire Grabovez (collectively “Grabovez”) filed a motion to compel discovery. On that same day, Defendant Benicorp Insurance Co. (Benicorp) filed a motion for a protective order. For the following reasons, Benicorp’s motion is *620GRANTED [Doc. No. 82] and Grabovez’s motion is DENIED [Doc. No. 85].
I. Procedural Background
On March 29, 2005, Grabovez filed a complaint in state court claiming a wrongful denial of benefits, promissory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Judith Perlman v. Swiss Bank Corporation Comprehensive Disability Protection PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Kathleen Semien v. Life Insurance Company of North America, a Cigna Company, and Bp Long Term Disability (Ltd) PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- William C. Davis, Cross-Appellee v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America, and Regal-Beloit Corporation Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fountain v. Zimmer Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Fountain v. Zimmer Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
- Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022
- Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025