Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Lyons

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 1911No. 1,964PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLVERTON, District Judge.

E. M. Barnes, by petition filed in this court, prays a peremptory mandamus directing and requiring Hon. Thomas R. Lyons, judge of the District Court in and for the District of Alaska, to permit petitioner to practice as an attorney in said court. An order to show cause was issued, and the case is now presented upon the petition and the return of Judge Lyons.

It appears that petitioner was prior to March 21, 1910, an attorney at law, duly licensed to practice in all of the courts of the District of Alaska; that on that date Hon. Edward E. Cushman, sitting and acting as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Ex Parte BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  5. Ex Parte SecombeSupreme Court of the United States · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thatcher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  2. Ex Parte Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. The Florida Bar v. PriorSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Alaska Board of Fish and Game v. LoescheAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Cornelius P. Coughlan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API