Legal Opinion

Mason v. Continental Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1924No. 13698PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

FOSTER, C.

This action was commenced in the district court of Washita county, Okla., on the 15th day of February, 1921, by the Continental Supply Company, a corporation, defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the Tamaqua Oil Company, a corporation, to recover the sum of $10,789.99 for and on account of goods, wares, and merchandise sold and delivered to the Tam-aqua Oil Company at its special instance and request. At the same time the Continental Supply Company caused an attachment to be levied upon certain personal property of the Tamaqua Oil Company, consisting of oil well…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bacigalupi v. Phoenix Building & Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. McAlester v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Bayer v. BayerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. City of El Reno v. CullinaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  5. Shields v. John Shields Construction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregon, State Highway Com'n v. DeLong Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API