Legal Opinion
Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Hotel Rittenhouse Associates
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 9, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-2809PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK, District Judge.
In this action the Bank of America (the Bank) seeks to foreclose a mortgage on real estate located in the Rittenhouse square area of Philadelphia, known as the Hotel Rittenhouse Project, to recover on a promissory note and mortgage against Hotel Rittenhouse Associates (HRA), Jack L. Wolgin and Jack L. Wolgin Associates-, general partners of HRA, and to recover against Jack L. Wolgin and Muriel Wolgin on a guarantee. The note, mortgage and guarantee were executed in connection with a construction loan for the Hotel Rittenhouse, a…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Marine Bank v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Santiago v. Temple UniversityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Centennial Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Baby Neal v. CaseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Shinn v. Thrust IV, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- National Railroad Passenger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.