Legal Opinion
Santiago v. Temple University
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 4, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-9144PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
This action includes claims for alleged violations of the Federal Rehabilitation Act (Count I), due process (Count II), retaliatory conduct in violation of the First Amendment (Count III), retaliatory discharge under Pennsylvania law (Count IV), and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count V).
Plaintiffs claims in Counts I and II are premised on the assumptions that he was “handicapped” as defined under the Federal Rehabilitation Act (the “Act”), that he was “otherwise qualified” under the Act, that he could be reasonably accommodated for his…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Connick Ex Rel. Parish of Orleans v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Mary M. Tyndall v. National Education Centers, Incorporated of California, T/a Kee Business College Campus National Education Centers, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Bonita McDonald v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Public Welfare, Polk CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Dallas County v. Gonzales, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
- David L. Hypes, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Child Sarah Hypes, and Megan Hypes v. First Commerce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Falczynski v. Amoco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.