Legal Opinion
Maguire Industries, Inc. v. Harrington & Richardson Arms Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided July 21, 1948No. Civil Action No. 7157PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALEY, District Judge.
This matter came on for hearing on the defendant’s motion for a summary judgment in its favor pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and for its costs plus reasonable attorneys’ fees.
Plaintiff, Maguire Industries, Incorporated, instituted this action to recover damages for alleged patent infringement by the defendant of United States Letters Patent No. 1,605,393 and No. 1,636,357. Plaintiff, Richard M. Cutts, Jr., was joined by the plaintiff Maguire Industries, Inc., as an involuntary plaintiff as the owner of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Jackson v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- E. I. S. Mfg. Co. v. Supco Products Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Marvel Carburetor Co. v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by4 opinions
- Biosyntec, Inc. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 1990
- Goldhaft v. MoorhouseDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Hook v. Hook & Ackerman, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Panaview Door & Window Co. v. Van NessDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955