Bramlette v. Titus

OPINION

By the Court,

Belford, District Judge:

Appellants were engaged in the cattle business in California and respondents were engaged in the same business in Nevada. In the fall of 1948 the parties entered into an oral agreement under the terms of which appellants were to deliver certain of their cattle to respondents’ ranch where they would graze with respondents’ cattle and be cared for by respondents. For this privilege appellants were to pay to respondents one dollar per head per month except for small calves.

The evidence is in sharp conflict as to the other provisions of the contract but…