Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Andrus

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 15, 2009No. Civil Action 03-2098PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.

Before the Court are seven motions for summary judgment filed by the defendants (R. Docs. 206, 207, 208, 211, 212, 216, 217) and six cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the plaintiffs (R. Docs. 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223). As explained below, the motions focus on whether the fees charged by Louisiana clerks of court were authorized by state statute. In this federal due process challenge, however, the contested state law issues are irrelevant to the question of liability. The key issue is whether the clerks provided the plaintiffs with…

2Cases cited74 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spann v. Bogalusa City Police DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  2. Woodard v. AndrusDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010
  3. Zvi v. Blanco Sheriff OfficeDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API