Legal Opinion

Rozier v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1921No. 6402PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Franklin. Tried below before the Honorable R. T. Wilkinson. Appeal from a conviction of unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquors; penalty, one year imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case. Cited cases in opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction was for unlawfully transporting intoxicating liquor. Punishment one year in penitentiary.

There are no bills of exceptions in the record. Appellant’s motion to quash the indictment because our law is in conflict with the Federal law upon the subject of intoxicating liquor was properly overruled. Franklin v. State, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 342, 230 S. W. Rep., 692; Ex parte Gilmore, 88 Texas Crim. Rep., 529, 228 S. W. Rep., 199.

Appellant urges in his motion for new trial that the evidence shows he was acting under duress in his connection with the whisky, and therefore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Burton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  4. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Hooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Epps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Samaras v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Bigley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API