Gonsalves v. Petaluma & Santa Rosa Ry.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Plaintiffs, suing as administrators of the estate of Manuel Gonsalves, deceased, brought their action against defendant for having negligently occasioned his death by putting him to work in an unsafe place. So far as concerns this appeal the negligence is conceded, it being stated in the transcript that “evidence was introduced by plaintiffs which, for the purpose of any appeal from the judgment herein, defendant admits tended to prove and was sufficient to prove that the death of Manuel Gonsalves was caused by the negligence of defendant.” The complaint charged that the deceased at the time…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Payne v. . N.Y., S. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Ruiz v. Santa Barbara Gas & Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- St. Germain v. Potlatch Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. OxnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Clark v. Tulare Lake Dredging Co.California Court of Appeal · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taylor v. Albion Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Madeline Curry, Etc. v. Fred Olsen Line, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Ginochio v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Soto v. Spring Valley Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.