Legal Opinion

Oakdale Farms, Inc. v. Rutland R.R. Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 4, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The material allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint are that on November 3, 1927, at Winthrop, N. Y., it delivered to the defendant, a common carrier, and the defendant accepted, seventy-seven cans of milk to be safely carried to New York City, and there to be delivered to the plaintiff for a reasonable reward; that the defendant did not safely carry said milk to New York City nor deliver it to the plaintiff, but, on the contrary thereof, “by the negligence, carelessness and default of the defendant, said seventy-seven cans of milk * * # were broken into, spilled, plundered, stolen and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Manley Bros. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. Davis & Gay v. Central Vermont RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1893
  3. Leavens v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1913
  4. Haglin-Stahr Co. v. Montpelier & Wells River RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  5. Saliba v. New York Central R.R. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dansro v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1936
  2. Wetmore v. Hooker Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Lambert Construction Company v. Socony Mobil Oil Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API